|
|
Post by ccnamaster on Mar 14, 2012 7:20:24 GMT -8
hi all
if i haven't any referrers in my account
all by me only publishing urls to get money
adfoc.us will pay to me or they will told me you have no referrers
need help please |
|
|
|
Post by dressler on Mar 14, 2012 7:31:22 GMT -8
I don't think their should be any problem with that ...Submit a support ticket showing your site to the staff or telling them how you'll be getting the traffic (better to be on the safe side then getting dumped in the end)
|
|
|
|
Post by ccnamaster on Mar 14, 2012 8:31:59 GMT -8
i haven't website i am publishing with my self in internet forums also blogs every where also social engine like Facebook and twitter and G+ there any any problem  |
|
|
|
Post by dressler on Mar 14, 2012 8:58:43 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by Kambatra on Mar 14, 2012 9:48:44 GMT -8
Can anybody tell me what is the meaning of blank refrer?
|
|
|
|
Post by ccnamaster on Mar 14, 2012 10:04:11 GMT -8
it means that you have referrers people under you and not active persons
they make u ban her
so don't refer not active persons under your acount
|
|
|
|
Post by fig2k4 on Mar 14, 2012 11:54:14 GMT -8
The HTTP referrer is nothing to do with your adfoc.us referrals. When you click on a link on a website, the referrer is passed on so that the destination site knows where the click came from. Not the best description, so here's a link to more info. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_refererAs an example, if you clicked on the Wii Backup Manager link on my signature, I'd be able to see that someone clicked that link because the referrer would be adfocus.proboards.com. Without the referrer present in the header, adfoc.us has no idea where your traffic is coming from. It could be from automatic surfing or some other dodgy source. That's why it's not allowed. Really, there should be no reason for the referrer to be missing. Unless all your users are using anonymous proxies etc. or a 3rd party URL shortening service is removing it or not passing it on correctly. |
|
|
|
Post by ccnamaster on Mar 14, 2012 12:59:33 GMT -8
no answer in support tickets
|
|
|
|
Post by brucerobin on Mar 14, 2012 13:42:52 GMT -8
Really, there should be no reason for the referrer to be missing. Unless all your users are using anonymous proxies etc. or a 3rd party URL shortening service is removing it or not passing it on correctly. In all these cases, the referrer will be. this will be the site address with the link.  That's why I was so surprised by his absence.  support ticket already and does not know what to think ... began with "your traffic without referrer" ended with "you are missing links" ;D Now the fourth day of silence ... thinks ... ;D |
|
|
|
Post by AdFoc.us on Mar 14, 2012 15:14:45 GMT -8
Blank referrers are allowed as long as there is undeniable evidence that the source of traffic is legitimate. It's very hard to prove because referrers are passed with every user. If you have a large percentage of blank referrers, your traffic is suspicious.
For example, you have a red flag on your account for excessive blank referrers. During the red flag review process you claim that the traffic is from a blog with links. We have to make a judgement based on your other referrers whether or not it's legitimate. If there is a high rate of blank referrers and the user claims ALL of the traffic is from the blog it could be illegitimate.
There are many other factors but that is a basic example of how we look at referrers.
|
|
|
|
Post by brucerobin on Mar 15, 2012 0:48:48 GMT -8
For example, you have a red flag on your account for excessive blank referrers. During the red flag review process you claim that the traffic is from a blog with links. We have to make a judgement based on your other referrers whether or not it's legitimate. If there is a high rate of blank referrers and the user claims ALL of the traffic is from the blog it could be illegitimate. Yeah ... Supports screens looked blog. Supporting Looked links to the blog. Supporting Looked screen with the issue of Google's blog. And the support authoritatively stated - on the blog no links. Do not tell. ;D Take in the top referrer statistics. All of these services, it is. |
|
|
|
Post by AdFoc.us on Mar 15, 2012 18:16:57 GMT -8
I can't understand what you are saying.
|
|
|
|
Post by brucerobin on Mar 16, 2012 9:09:26 GMT -8
I say that your support is illiterate. Let go to school. ;D
To send the referrer should be 15-20 seconds of the session. Each session will be cut free hosting. In order to save.
Moreover, I am not saying anything. Everything said in the "Official Announcements". It says:
1. base buggy
2. statistics miserable
3. how to fix, we do not know.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kambatra on Mar 16, 2012 9:49:08 GMT -8
Lol , :-P
|
|
|
|
Post by fig2k4 on Mar 16, 2012 12:00:23 GMT -8
brucerobinWhy don't you post the link to your blog here and everyone will see if the links are there or not? Considering people are trying to make money from their links, I'm really surprised about how secretive everyone is about where they have them. I have a feeling that wouldn't make any more sense even if you posted it in your native language, I've absolutely no idea what you're saying. 15-20 seconds for what session? I can tell you're trying to be sarcastic about something, I just don't know what. KambatraDid you read what I posted about the HTTP referrer? Any response about what you've learned or do you need any more help with that?
|
|
That's why I was so surprised by his absence. 
